中国循证医学杂志

中国循证医学杂志

中国护理临床实践指南质量评价标准的信效度评价

查看全文

目的 评价中国护理临床实践指南质量评价标准的信度和效度。 方法 由不同评价者采用中国护理领域临床实践指南质量评价标准和 AGREE II 工具对两份护理领域内的临床实践指南分别进行质量评价,采用组内相关系数测量评价工具的信度,采用一致性检验测量评价工具的效度。 结果 5 名评价者采用中国护理领域临床实践指南质量评价标准对艾滋病指南及静脉输液指南进行评价,组内相关系数(ICC)分别为 0.979 及 0.890,采用 AGREE Ⅱ 对艾滋病指南及静脉输液指南进行质量评价,组内相关系数(ICC)分别为 0.957 及 0.887。评价者采用中国护理领域临床实践指南质量评价标准及 AGREE Ⅱ 对艾滋病指南评价的一致性系数为 0.880,呈高度一致性,对静脉输液指南评价的一致性系数为 0.886,也呈高度一致性。 结论 中国护理领域临床实践指南质量评价标准具有较好的信度和效度,可作为护理领域内指南的质量评价工具,在使用该工具前,应对该用具进行详细解读,或进行统一培训,以减少评价者偏倚。

Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity on quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines. Method Five appraisers were included to assess two clinical nursing practice guidelines using the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines and AGREE Ⅱ. ICC and coefficient of consistency were adopted to assess the reliability and validity of the appraisal tools. Results ICC for two guidelines of AIDS and infusion by the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines were 0.979 and 0.890. ICC for two guidelines of AIDS and infusion by AGREE Ⅱ were 0.957 and 0.887. The coefficient of consistency for guidelines of AIDS and infusion by the two appraisal tools were 0.880 and 0.886, both were high consistent. Conclusion The quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines had good reliability and validity and can be the appraisal tool for quality evaluation of clinical nursing practice guidelines. It is strongly recommended that the users should understand the appraisal tool or should be trained to decrease the bias.

关键词: 临床实践指南; 循证护理; 质量评价标准; 信效度评价

Key words: Clinical practice guideline; Evidence-based nursing; Quality criteria; Reliability and validity

登录后 ,请手动点击刷新查看全文内容。 没有账号,
登录后 ,请手动点击刷新查看图表内容。 没有账号,
1. 王小钦, 王吉耀. 循证临床实践指南的制定与实施. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2016.1-50.
2. Available at: https://www.g-i-n.net/library/international-guidelines-library.
3. IOM. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington DC. The national Academies Press, 2011.
4. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet, 1993, 342(8883): 1317-1322.
5. Lannone P, Montano N, Minardi M, et al. Wrong guidelines: why and how often they occur. Evid Based Med, 2017, 22(1): 1-3.
6. 李楠, 姚亮, 吴琼芳, 等. 2012~2013 年中国大陆期刊发表临床实践指南质量评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2013, 13(6): 621-623.
7. 王琪. 中国临床实践指南质量评价研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2017.
8. 上海市公卫卫生临床中心, 复旦大学 JBI 循证护理合作中心. 艾滋病临床护理实践指南. 2014,.
9. Infusion nurses society. Infusion therapy standards of practice. J Infus Nurs, 2016, 39(1S): S1-S113.
10. 王吉耀, 王强, 王小钦, 等. 中国临床实践指南评价体系的制定与初步验证. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(20): 1544-1548.
11. 周英凤, 王强, 胡雁, 等. 中国护理领域临床实践指南质量评价标准的构建. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(9): 1-5.
12. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. The Global Rating Scale complements the AGREE II in advancing the quality of practice guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol, 2012, 65(5): 526-534.
13. 方积乾, 陆盈. 现代医学统计学. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2002: 80-87.
14. 马斌荣. 医学科研中的统计方法. 北京: 北京科学出版社, 2005: 3.
15. 陈耀龙, 杨克虎, 田金徽, 等. 循证实践指南的制定: 国际经验与中国实践. 兰州大学学报 (医学版), 2016, 42(1): 29-35.
16. siering U, Eikermann M, Hausner E, et al. Appraisal tools for clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. PLoS one, 2013, 8(12): e 82915.
17. 张悦, 张士靖, 周志超, 等. 国际临床指南评价工具的发展与启示. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2015, 24(1): 11-16.
18. 胡雁, 郝玉芳. 循证护理学. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 216.