中国循证医学杂志

中国循证医学杂志

单病例随机对照试验的证据级别和报告规范

查看全文

本文对比呈现了 CONSORT 协作组有关随机对照试验与单病例随机对照试验报告质量评价规范的条目,将 GRADE 证据质量评估理念与单病例随机对照试验原理结合探索,进一步发展单病例随机对照试验方法学,以期将来在疾病的临床研究中广泛应用单病例随机对照试验方法。

The study appeared the comparison between CONSORT and CENT, and promoted the combination with GRADE and N-of-1 trial. Our objective is to develop the method of N-of-1 trial further and to widely use in clinical researches of some disease.

关键词: 单病例随机对照试验; 证据级别; 质量评估

Key words: N-of-1 trial; Levels of evidence; Quality assessment

登录后 ,请手动点击刷新查看全文内容。 没有账号,
登录后 ,请手动点击刷新查看图表内容。 没有账号,
1. Guyatt GH, Meade MO, Jaeschke RZ, et al. Practitioners of evidence based care: not all clinicians need to appraise evidence from scratchbut all need some skills. BMJ, 2000, 320(7240): 954-955.
2. Guyatt GH, Haynes B, Jaeschke RZ, et al. The philosophy of evidence-based medicine. In users’ guides to the medical literature. Chicago: AMA Press, 2002.
3. No authors listed. Canadian task force on the periodic health examination: the periodic health examination. CMAJ, 1979, 121(19): 1193-1254.
4. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2004, 328(7454): 1490-1494.
5. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ, 2008, 336(7653): 1106-1110.
6. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Group. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol, 2010, 63(8): e1-37.
7. Vohra S, Shamseer L, Sampson M, et al. CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement. BMJ, 2015, 350: h1738.
8. 张燕舞, 蒋朱明, 王杨, 等. 与转化医学有关的临床研究质量及研究报告质量的评价工具. 中华临床营养杂志, 2011, 19(1): 1-6.