中国循证医学杂志

中国循证医学杂志

健康教育在慢性胃炎护理干预中效果的随机对照试验

查看全文

目的 探讨健康教育在慢性胃炎护理干预中的效果。 方法 纳入 2016 年 2 月至 2017 年 6 月我院收治的 142 例慢性胃炎患者,将其随机分为试验组和对照组。对照组给予常规治疗和护理,试验组在对照组的基础上给予健康教育干预。比较两组在总有效率、疾病知识知晓度、护理效率、护理满意度和护理质量等方面的差异。 结果 试验组纳入患者 71 例,对照组纳入患者 71 例。两组在性别、年龄、病程等基线特征方面差异无统计学意义。试验组在总有效率、疾病知识知晓率、护理满意度、护理质量方面均优于对照组(P值均<0.05)。 结论 健康教育干预在慢性胃炎护理中不仅可提高慢性胃炎患者的疾病知识知晓度,还能改善护理质量、临床效果和护理满意度。

Objectives To investigate the clinical efficacy of health education intervention on chronic gastritis nursing. Methods A total of 142 patients with chronic gastritis in our hospital were recruited from February 2016 to June 2017. All patients were randomly assigned into two groups. The control group received conventional therapy and routine nursing, whereas the case group was offered with extra health education based on control group. Then related disease knowledge, nursing efficiency, nursing satisfaction, and nursing quality were compared. Results A total of 71 patients were in the case group, while 71 patients in the control group. Compared with the control group, the case group achieved better related disease knowledge, nursing satisfaction, total nursing efficiency, psychological status, sleep quality, exercise training, and daily diet (all P value<0.05). Conclusions Health education intervention not only can enhance disease knowledge of patients with chronic gastritis but also improve nursing quality, clinical effects and nursing satisfaction. Thus, it is worthy of further popularization in clinics.

关键词: 健康教育干预; 慢性胃炎; 护理; 临床疗效; 随机对照试验

Key words: Health education intervention; Chronic gastritis; Nursing; Clinical efficacy; Randomized controlled trial

引用本文: 阳国兴, 杜光会, 张冲, 吴海燕. 健康教育在慢性胃炎护理干预中效果的随机对照试验. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(8): 812-815. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201801094 复制

登录后 ,请手动点击刷新查看全文内容。 没有账号,
登录后 ,请手动点击刷新查看图表内容。 没有账号,
1. Makki AM, Aldaqal SM, Alorabi SH, et al. Chronic gastritis in morbidly obese patients with sleeve gastrectomy. Electron Physician, 2016, 8(1): 1786-1790.
2. Shiratori S, Mabe K, Yoshii S, et al. Two cases of chronic gastritis with non-helicobacter pylori helicobacter infection. Intern Med, 2016, 55(14): 1865-1869.
3. 张声生, 唐旭东, 黄穗平, 等. 慢性胃炎中医诊疗专家共识意见(2017). 中华中医药杂志, 2017, 32(7): 3060-3064.
4. Sabry D, Ahmed R, Abdalla S, et al. Braf, Kras and Helicobacter pylori epigenetic changes-associated chronic gastritis in Egyptian patients with and without gastric cancer. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2016, 32(6): 92.
5. Toyoda T, Shi L, Takasu S, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of capsaicin and piperine on helicobacter pylori-induced chronic gastritis in Mongolian gerbils. Helicobacter, 2016, 21(2): 131-142.
6. 张建梅, 王凤. 强化心理干预在慢性胃炎患者中的应用价值及对生活质量的影响. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2017, 22(6): 875-877.
7. Tursi A, Grattagliano I, De Polo M, et al. Noninvasive prediction of chronic atrophic gastritis in autoimmune thyroid disease in primary care. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2014, 49(11): 1394-1396.
8. 万桂生. 健康教育对慢性胃炎患者康复的影响. 深圳中西医结合杂志, 2014, 24(9): 192-193.
9. Arisawa T, Tahara T, Shibata T, et al. Functional polymorphisms in the promoter region of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and chronic gastritis. Int J Mol Med, 2007, 20(4): 539-544.
10. Hare WV, Stewart HL. Chronic gastritis of the glandular stomach, adenomatous polyps of the duodenum, and calcareous pericarditis in strain DBA mice. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1956, 16(4): 889-911.
11. International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas 7th edition (2015). Available at: www.idf.org/e-library/epidemiology-experimental/diabetes-atlas.
12. Gucciardi E, Chan VWS, Fortugno M, et al. Primary care physician referral patterns to diabetes education programs in Southern Ontario, Canada. Can J Diabetes, 2011, 35(3): 262-268.
13. Li L, Kong L, Song H. The therapeutic effect of zerumbone on chronic gastritis via antioxidant mechanisms. Exp Ther Med, 2017, 14(3): 2505-2510.
14. Fernández C, Bellosillo B, Ferraro M, et al. MicroRNAs 142-3p, miR-155 and miR-203 are deregulated in gastric MALT lymphomas compared to chronic gastritis. Cancer Genomics Proteomics, 2017, 14(1): 75-82.
15. Aasarød KM, Mosti MP, Stunes AK, et al. Impaired skeletal health in patients with chronic atrophic gastritis. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2016, 51(7): 774-781.
16. Scherer M, Hansen H, Gensichen J, et al. Association between multimorbidity patterns and chronic pain in elderly primary care patients: a cross-sectional observational study. BMC Fam Pract, 2016, 17: 68.
17. Wang Q, Brenner S, Leppert G, et al. Health seeking behaviour and the related household out-of-pocket expenditure for chronic non-communicable diseases in rural Malawi. Health Policy Plan, 2015, 30(2): 242-252.
18. 何电, 郑媛, 詹思延. 患者决策辅助系统的发展与应用. 中国循证医学杂志, 2015, 15(12): 1484-1488.
19. 刘妍. 健康教育干预对慢性胃炎患者护理效果的影响分析. 中国卫生产业, 2016, 13(30): 50-52.
20. 郑真, 吴慧堃, 杨美媛, 等. 门诊慢性胃炎患者健康知识认知现状及需求调查. 中华现代护理杂志, 2009, 15(22): 2146-2148.
21. 周倩妹, 谢晓静, 马桂娟, 等. 护理健康教育对老年患者全口义齿修复效果的系统评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2017, 17(7): 829-834.
22. 汤晶晶, 施榕. 加拿大糖尿病社区健康教育概况及其对我国的启示. 中国全科医学, 2018, 21(4): 385.
23. 孙利平. 健康教育在慢性胃炎护理中的应用效果分析. 中国继续医学教育, 2016, 8(2): 239-240.
24. Mira JJ, Guilabert M, Sempere L, et al. Opinions about the health care process of the patients with irritable intestine syndrome. Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas, 2015, 107(4): 202-210.
25. 王青力. 健康教育干预应用于慢性胃炎护理的临床效果分析. 饮食保健, 2017, 4(14): 296-297.